Studie z lidských práv/Studies in Human Rights (e-shop)
Studie z lidských práv/Studies in Human Rights (Full-text Books - Archive)
Studie z lidských práv/Studies in Human Rights
Redakční rada/Editorial Board
- Prof. JUDr. Pavel Šturma, DrSc. (Charles University, Prague) – Editor-in-Chief
- Doc. JUDr. PhDr. Veronika Bílková, PhD., E.MA (Institute of International Relations and CU, Prague)
- Prof. JUDr. Mahulena Hofmann, CSc. (Université de Luxembourg)
- Prof. Peter D. Jacobson, JD, MPH (University of Michigan)
- Prof. JUDr. Dalibor Jílek, CSc. (Paneuropean University, Bratislava)
- Prof. JUDr. Jan Kysela, PhD., DSc. (Charles University, Prague)
- JUDr. Pavel Ondřejek, PhD. (Charles University, Prague)
- JUDr. Josef Skála, CSc. (Institut Suisse de DroitComparé, Lausanne)
- Doc. Dr.iur. Mgr. Harald Ch. Scheu, PhD. (Charles University, Prague)
- Doc. JUDr. Martin Štefko, PhD. (Charles University, Prague)
- JUDr. Petr Šustek, PhD. (Charles University, Prague)
Etický publikační kodex/Code of Publishing Ethics
1.1 Studies in Human Rights ( hereinafter SMP ) publishes articles in the fields of legal theory (jurisprudence), international law, public and private national and comparative law and European law, whose high quality is assured by anonymous peer-review process. Review and evaluation of manuscripts must therefore be thorough, objective and fair.
1.2 This Code of Ethics describes the principles of ethical behavior of all participants in the review and evaluation of the manuscript. Authors, editors and reviewers are required to follow rules set out in this Code of Ethics.
The internationally accepted standards COPE will be applied in case of misconduct of these principles: https://publicationethics.org/files/u2/All_flowcharts.pdf
2.1 Each manuscript submitted to the SLP for evaluation must be an original piece of work in Czech or English language. The manuscript should not be published or accepted for publication in another journal or publisher. Exceptions to the rule of "originality" are valid for the following works: 1) conference papers published on the conference Web site;
2) Unpublished master's, doctoral, and habilitation thesis. Author cannot send magazine CYIL a manuscript for consideration, which is subject to assessment by another magazine, or send a manuscript, which is at the moment considered by the SLP, to another journal.
2.2 The manuscript must not contain plagiarism, falsification, fiction or serious omissions. The authors are obliged to refer to the works of other authors, if it is quoted verbatim or paraphrase their thoughts. In the case of plagiarism or auto-plagiarism (repeated publication of their own works), the manuscript will be rejected.
2.3 Auto-plagiarism (duplicate publications of his/her own works) is in principle unacceptable. If the manuscript draws from another author’s work, that has already been published in print or considered for publication, the author must give credits to this work.
2.4 Authors can publish partial results of their research in several publications. Each of these publications, however, must maintain its originality. The texts must differ as to their research objective and a corresponding degree of structure, content or language.
2.5 Author must ensure that the manuscript does not violate any copyrights. If the author uses foreign works (graphics, tables) and their use requires the consent of the author, he or she is responsible for obtaining necessary permissions before submitting the manuscript. UNCE – Human Rights Research Centre (Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law) as a publisher holds the copyright on all articles published in the SLP. Reprinting an article published in SLP, such as book chapters or translation is possible. However, you must seek the express consent of the publisher of the journal before re-publishing the article. To requests permission for reprinting an article published in SLP, please send e-mail to the editor of the journal.
3.1 Editors (members of the editorial board) retain their independence. Editors cannot abuse their position and must provide access to authors discreetly, impartially, promptly, constructively and sensitively. The editors assess manuscripts on the basis of their professional qualities, without ideological prejudices and personal preferences. Editors are seeking theoretical and methodological pluralism, but should also expect manuscripts to have an adequate level of expertise that will be beneficial to the reader.
3.2 As part of the review process, manuscript will be evaluated by two renowned experts whose professional profile corresponds to the assessed contribution. Editor selects reviewers based on their publications on the subject, their academic contributions and their previous experience as authors or reviewers in the SLP.
3.3 Authors can ask the editors that the manuscript has not been evaluated by specific reviewers, but the final decision on the selection of reviewers is left to the discretion of the editors.
3.4 The responsibility for the acceptance or rejection of manuscripts belongs to the editor, which will be consistent with the recommendations of the reviewers as a team. Editors inform reviewers of the results of the review process and the final decision on acceptance or rejection of the manuscript.
4.1 Processing evaluation reports for the journal brings benefit to the author, the journal and the scientific community as a whole. Editors appreciate the time and energy reviewers devote to express their opinion. Reviewers should abstain from reviewing a manuscript if their position or affiliation can cause a potential conflict of interest. In case that there is a potential conflict of interest, reviewers must inform our editorial office.
4.2 Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts impartially, objectively, fairly and professionally. Reviewers ought to be honest with the author if they have doubts about the quality of the manuscript. Reviewers are expected to provide adequately reasoned recommendation to the editors, and provide sufficient comments and recommended changes to the author. Reviewers must compile the evaluation report promptly based on the agreed date.
When formalizing the Code, we were inspired from the following sources:
- Eden , Lorraine - Cantwell , John ( 2010) : Code of Ethics : Journal of International Business Studies. September 18, 2010 ,
- Ministry of Education ( 2005) : Ethical Framework research. Prague: Ministry of Education , Youth and Sports,
- IIR (2010 ) : Code of Ethics of Research at the Institute of International Relations . Prague: Institute of International Relations ,
- Code of Ethics magazine International Relations : <https://www.mezinarodnivztahy.com/about/ethics>.
pro lidská práva
nám. Curieových 7
116 40 Praha 1
11. 5. 2018
Vyšel nový Bulletin UNCE
On-line verze ke stažení zde.
Video o Radě Evropy
a právního státu.